🔗 Share this article

Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly shown his desire to see critics investigated, exerting influence on the DOJ to prosecute ex FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We can't delay further, it's killing our standing and trustworthiness," the leader stated last month in a Truth Social post.

"I was impeached me, and indicted me (five times!)" he said, mentioning the four criminal cases he faced after departing the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Both have subsequently been charged, in situations that many specialists have said appear to be driven by politics and challenging to win in legal proceedings.

But the latest charges against a Trump critic, former security advisor John Bolton, differ significantly, legal experts and former prosecutors assert.

"In my opinion, contrasting Bolton's case to Comey's is like comparing two different things," stated Mark Lesko, a ex federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

This Specifics of Bolton's Legal Situation

Bolton has been criminally indicted on national allegations related to the alleged improper handling of classified information. Since leaving the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a outspoken Trump critic, going so far as to describe him "remarkably ignorant" and unfit for office in his book.

Experts say that while there may be political reasons to go after Bolton, the methods used to obtain an indictment and the evidence compiled against him indicate a potentially stronger legal argument than the Justice Department brought against Comey.

"This misconduct that's being claimed is simultaneously more serious and appears to have taken place over a significant period of time," commented Carissa Byrne Hessick, a professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his time as Trump's national security adviser, and following his 2019 White House exit, prosecutors claimed that Bolton put the nation at risk by improperly retaining and sending sensitive documents to family members using insecure means, including AOL. Some of the materials were labeled highly classified.

The indictment alleges that at a certain time a unauthorized user accessed to Bolton's system where documents were kept and sent an seeming threat to cause "the biggest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were released".

Bolton pleaded not guilty during a hearing on recently to 18 distinct charges of improperly handling classified information.

Political Motivation or a Strong Case?

The timing of his indictment - coming on the heels of charges against Comey - has renewed questions about external influence on the justice system.

Trump previously suggested Bolton belonged in prison, and called him a "disreputable person". Bolton, for his part, wrote a book about his experience in the Trump government that was highly critical of the leader.

"There's no question that the timing of this charge, when combined with additional cases, has prompted doubts about the validity of these allegations, and the reason these charges are being filed at this time," stated Jamil Jaffer, creator and director of the National Security Institute.

However, he continued, "if the Justice Department is capable to prove the facts stated and demonstrate the information is correctly designated, his conduct may certainly have broken the law".

Charging such a high-ranking figure for improperly handling sensitive materials is "rare" but not unprecedented, noted Carrie Cordero, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

"Situations that concern sensitive materials pose challenges to try, but they may and are filed against both low-level and high-level personnel, from time to time," she said.

Similarities to Examinations into Trump and Biden

Trump similarly encountered allegations of improperly storing sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida and obstructing their return, but that matter was ultimately thrown out by a court official and negated by his return as leader.

A special counsel additionally determined that former President Joe Biden improperly maintained sensitive materials from his period as second-in-command, but did not prosecute him.

Bolton's situation bears similarities to Biden's classified documents matters, noted Mr Lesko, who also held a top security position at the DOJ.

Rigorous protocols govern the management of classified documents. To win a guilty verdict, the prosecution must prove that Bolton was aware the information he was transmitting was classified, and he had to knowingly transfer it to someone not entitled to receive it.

"Because of the sensitive character of the material at question in this matter, we lack a lot of particulars about the reasons the prosecution contends elements like the diary entries and the additional information he communicated by electronic message, and the reason there were classified," explained Mr Jaffer.

A More Conventional Prosecution

The procedure by which the Justice Department initiated this case will be closely examined, following Trump publicly expressed his wish to see his critics prosecuted and several of those charges came to fruition.

But Mr Lesko said in Bolton's case, prosecutors appear to have adhered to standard procedure.

"The Bolton case and ultimately the charge appeared to have observed the regular process including the rules and norms within the Department of Justice," he stated.

In contrast to Comey's short, two-page charge, Bolton's was a more "conventional" document that "clearly outlines the details involving the circumstances and circumstances here," Mr Lesko commented.

"It appears fairly aligned with a long line of cases... where public servants improperly handled and shared classified material."