🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting changes to a pending law that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

It comes amid wider concerns about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Last month, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of business advocacy globally. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be decreased to 30% or 50% “following international guideline limits”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass 65% of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for various offences “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary states the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We exist in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative stated: “The company operates its operations according with applicable local laws. Moreover, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which enable interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, adding that underage people should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to realize planned public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, noting that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.