🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes added later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously backed the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I hope he does because then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. So there was some opposition. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on if the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.